27 May 2021
For once, well organised LANDLORDS are threatening to take the council to the High Court over plans to expand a housing licensing scheme.
York Residential Landlords Association claim City of York Council’s proposals are “unlawful and irrational”.
The council’s legal team is considering a solicitor’s letter from the landlords’ association, a spokesperson said.
A consultation is currently running on plans to extend the licensing scheme for houses in multiple occupation (HMOs) in York. Currently all homes containing five or more people from more than one household – for example shared student houses or bedsits – must be licensed to meet certain standards.
Under the proposals, the licensing scheme would be expanded to include all smaller HMOs in areas of the city where there are high levels of shared housing – council wards Hull Road, Guildhall, Fishergate, Clifton, Heworth, Micklegate, Osbaldwick and Derwent and Fulford and Heslington.
The council says the proposals have been put forward because it wants to “ensure our city has a safe, well-managed and professionally run private rented sector”. Said Phil Turtle, director at Landlord Licensing & Defence, “We see licensing scheme after scheme promoted where the PR departments puts these waffle-words in the mouths of their councillors. But the hard truth is that council Finance departments have decided that Landlords are their new cash cow. The combination of Licensing Fees and, even more so, the Civil Penalty Fines they can levy on both decent and rogue landlords as a result, is a £multi-million revenue stream for their cash-strapped organisations. On behalf of York Residential Landlords Association, renowned solicitor David Smith, who specialises in residential property rights, has sent a very strong letter to the council.
It says the association’s members are “deeply concerned”. They have three main concerns – they claim that the consultation is unlikely to meet the requirements of a lawful consultation, that the documents accompanying the consultation fail to make a “clearly evidenced case” for the scheme to be rolled out, and that parts of the proposed scheme are unlawful.
It adds: “For these reasons, we consider that any decision to proceed with an additional HMO licensing scheme on the basis of the consultation as it stands is likely to be irrational, unlawful, and ultra vires [beyond the legal authority of] the powers of the council.
“If a decision is made on this basis we will advise our client to challenge it by way of judicial review in the administrative division of the High Court.”
“Our client remains happy to discuss alternatives to a licensing regime and to engage positively with the council.
“However, if the council determines to proceed with a licensing regime on the basis of the consultation then our client will have little choice other than to proceed to issue proceedings for judicial review of that decision.”
Tracey Carter, director of housing at the council, said the local authority has received the letter and it is being considered by the legal team.
She added: “All views expressed through the consultation on our licensing proposal are welcomed and taken seriously.
Phil Turtle notes that many of these consultations are far from rigorous, not comprehensive and is nearly all cases make no difference whatsoever to the councils’ already made decision to enact their cash-making scheme.
Landlords can respond against the proposed scheme here by June 27.
Thanks for reading!
Keep up with the latest from Landlord Licensing & Defence…
Subscribe to our YouTube Channel to find all our videos on Regulations, RRO, HMOs and much more! → https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCr1wNum9AR7kgFL9Kf0LT-Q
Join our private Facebook Group where you’ll find a support network of other landlords and experts as well as case studies and how to avoid council fines. → https://www.facebook.com/groups/1774212136183898
Follow us on Social Media for the latest in Property and Licensing…